Two significant items have happened in the last 24 hours.
First, Stan Kroenke has distanced himself from a statement made by a Mr. Mainka, a spokesman for MLS Colorado Rapids (which is owned by Kroenke). In Mr Mainka's statement it was claimed that Kroenke was not interested in making a bid for Arsenal!
So one can interpret Kroenke’s refusal to acknowledge Mr. Mainka that he is indeed interested in Arsenal.
Secondly Keith Edelman, Managing Director of the club, broke the club’s silence on the matter saying that the directors were committed to the club.
This does not however imply that the club will not be sold.
It may mean that the core of the Directors will remain at the club after a new owner comes in. This may be part of the deal that may already have been agreed! And this explains Fiszman’s initial sale of 1% of the club’s shares probably preparing for his full exit from the club (it also earned him a nice premium as the price of the shares has gone up since he sold the initial 1%)!
The transfer of shares from Friar to Hillwood falls in line with this interpretation. Yes, it may have been a past loan between the two but the reason the shares have been returned at this particular juncture probably implies that the latter wishes to dispose them! To the new owner?
Is Mr Wenger aware of what is going on?
Keith Edelman’s statement of “commitment to the club” probably implies that continuity as far as the manager is concerned is part and parcel of the deal.
First, Stan Kroenke has distanced himself from a statement made by a Mr. Mainka, a spokesman for MLS Colorado Rapids (which is owned by Kroenke). In Mr Mainka's statement it was claimed that Kroenke was not interested in making a bid for Arsenal!
So one can interpret Kroenke’s refusal to acknowledge Mr. Mainka that he is indeed interested in Arsenal.
Secondly Keith Edelman, Managing Director of the club, broke the club’s silence on the matter saying that the directors were committed to the club.
This does not however imply that the club will not be sold.
It may mean that the core of the Directors will remain at the club after a new owner comes in. This may be part of the deal that may already have been agreed! And this explains Fiszman’s initial sale of 1% of the club’s shares probably preparing for his full exit from the club (it also earned him a nice premium as the price of the shares has gone up since he sold the initial 1%)!
The transfer of shares from Friar to Hillwood falls in line with this interpretation. Yes, it may have been a past loan between the two but the reason the shares have been returned at this particular juncture probably implies that the latter wishes to dispose them! To the new owner?
Is Mr Wenger aware of what is going on?
Keith Edelman’s statement of “commitment to the club” probably implies that continuity as far as the manager is concerned is part and parcel of the deal.
Posts
2 comments:
ugg boots ugg bootsuggs uggsugg sale ugg saleaustralia ugg bootswomens uggs boots womens uggs bootsmens uggs boots mens uggs bootskids uggs boots kids uggs bootsUGG Boots Accessories UGG Boots Accessoriesbailey button ugg boots bailey button ugg bootsnightfall ugg boots nightfall ugg bootssundance ii ugg boots sundance ii ugg bootsultra tall ugg boots ultra tall ugg bootsultra short ugg boots ultra short ugg bootsclassic tall ugg boots classic tall ugg bootsclassic short ugg boots classic short ugg bootsclassic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg bootsclassic mini ugg boots classic mini ugg bootsmetallic ugg boots metallic ugg boots As Seen On TV As Seen On TV As Seen On TV Discounts As Seen On TV Discounts As Seen On TV Promotions As Seen On TV Promotions As Seen On TV Store As Seen On TV Store As Seen On TV Products As Seen On TV Products As Seen On TV Infomercials As Seen On TV Infomercials TV Household TV Household TV Health TV Health TV Auto TV Auto TV Pets TV Pets TV Video TV Video TV Gifts TV Gifts TV Electronics TV Electronics TV Kids TV Kids
To be a upright lenient being is to from a kind of openness to the mankind, an gift to group aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can take you to be shattered in unequivocally outermost circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly weighty with the condition of the righteous compulsion: that it is based on a corporation in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a treasure, something kind of feeble, but whose mere special handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.
Post a Comment