By 1970's Gooner
I desisted communicating my anger and scathing criticism right after the City match as I was too disappointed and angry.
Now two days later the anger has gone but my disappointment is still there. And the reason is that almost all our obvious failings were avoidable and the reason they were avoidable is down to the ineptitude of the Coach.
Unai Emery proved inept because he thought the team were ready to start playing the ball out of defence in their first game of the season!
If you remember I pointed out in my last post that the effectiveness of our all out pressing during the pre season games was a joke and a lot of you slated me for it. But so it proved to be. And he surely saw that the players were not up to it...
Deciding to do it against a City team who are masters at getting out of it was suicidal and really smells of ineptitude in my mind.
It's also ineptitude to expect the goalie and the rest of the defence to get out of their half by passing the ball out...
It is also ineptitude not to change it during the game when it was so obvious that it wasn't working i.e Emery's ability to read the game and make corrective alterations come seriously into question.
Let's carry on:
Unai Emery proved to be inept by opting to play Maitland Niles as a left back when it was so obvious that the experience and character of Lichtsteiner was a far safer choice.
Guardiola and Arteta exploited it to the fullest extend. And don't tell me that Lichtsteiner was not ready. Stones for example came back to training much later than Lichtsteiner...
It smacks of ineptitude when Torreira was not in the first 11. Did Emery expect that Xhaka and /or Guendouzy would be able to play that role? Really?
Why not start Torreira and then take him out in the latter stages IF he got tired.
Let's carry on:
If Emery did not realise that we wouldn't be seeing the ball too much against City then doubts emerge about his judgement. And I am saying this with respect to Ramsey's position in the formation. He was deployed as a number 10!!
But his forte is to be a box to box midfielder and a playmaker. He was wasted up there and messed up Aubameyang too with his positioning. More importantly he was not able to give a way out with the ball in the midfield areas.
It smacks of ineptitude when Emery didn't realise that Lacazette should be starting in the same team as Aubameyang. We all saw the difference he made when he came on. And it was the same in the friendly games.
Mickitarian is not fit yet. I could tell having watched all the pre season games. It was so obvious but Emery had to start him. He was useless and predictably so.
And finally to expect Dozy Ozil to track back by positioning him on the wing is wildly over the top optimistic...
Most Gooners are writing the Chelsea game off. As things stand now we should be worried about the West Ham game too unless the right formation and players are selected. Then we have a chance in both games.
Get a grip Mr Emery....
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
"Aguero was in the same Uruguy team as Torreira" - Aguero is Argentinian... basically sums up the accuracy and insightfulness of your analysis tbh
yes, so he made one error, but what he said about Mr.Emery was correct!
It’s the first game out and he played the only way you can against a team like City or for that matter Liverpool, who will constantly press high. You have to play through the lines, string four or five passes together and break it. Playing long balls forward to the likes of Auba would be useless and play into their hands. I’d say playing Ozil and Mick on the wings was a mistake but the only chance of getting points against them is not to sit back in blocks and invite pressure but play through the lines. They are the best team in the PL and one of the best in Europe, but give it time and take some positives, it’s not going to happen overnight.
Yeah !! lets get Allardyce in and play some proper football.
Townsend said Arsenal played like last season : constant passing with no end product.Sterling ran at the defenders and shot and scored. When he was in the box,
defenders dare not tackle as they would outside.
You know I know football except one fm ,is about winning and not pass a thousand times before shooting, I am not a coach but defenders have it easy when they don't have to mark. All they have to do is wait and when danger is forthcoming they will
do whatever is necessary.
Hopefully against Chelsea Arsenal will pass and shoot more often.Sometimes a deflected shot can be shot home.
一般來講大約在155 公分 ~ 172 公分之間多為客人接受，而通常酒店小姐去酒店上班都一定要出場接s嗎？會比較吃香，因為這個身高範圍的小姐穿起高跟鞋來就一般男生來看是最理想的！
酒店小姐上班通常會取什麼名字?：體重~還是得配合小姐的身高來看，因為客人看的是整體的感覺過，過肥過瘦都不行，雖然體重過重一點整體看起是可以，不要太誇張加上衣服修飾起來好看的話，其實都會上的不錯的。但是上班後多數店家還是會有意無意的要妳減肥增重的因為~好還要更好~如果要用標準來訂的話那麼大約是43 公斤 ~ 55 公斤左右，這樣的數據當然還是要搭配身高來看！
雖然還是有些人是例外的，如果保養的好，看不出實際年齡加上整體給人的感覺一定也ＯＫ才行。不然年齡愈大競爭力一定愈小那是不爭的事實，如果要給酒店上班年齡一些數字的話那就18 ~ 35之間~~而 20 ~ 28 之間是最黃金的階段！
為什麼是 18 ~ 35 呢？因為要滿18才算成年~哈哈哈未成年到酒店工作是違法的。而35左右應該算是酒店公關生涯的尾聲了如果這時還想在酒店上班不是說不行，但能賺大錢的時間不多了一定要好好把握才行。28、29、30 歲才想來酒店上班一定要有抱著就是來酒店搶錢的心態，不然幼齒的那麼多不抱著必死的決心怎麼跟她們競爭。至於酒店錄取所在意的還是外型整體的感覺為主，也就是簡單的說要是年近 30 了
還有那外型條件和勇氣來酒店搶錢的話酒店還是熱烈歡迎的因為也是需要有熟女之類的小姐對付一些經驗老道的客人至於~~為何 20 ~ 28 歲為黃金階段呢？因為太小通常心態就是愛玩心不定！加上小朋友的感覺還在，20 ~ 28 歲左右就會比較有女人味的感覺，所以一定要把握這短短幾年的黃金階段全力搶錢喔！
總之～酒店工作時應徵的店家看的外型條件就是指：年齡 臉蛋 身高 體重 這四點
Post a Comment