Previous names: Dial Square, Royal Arsenal, Woolwich Arsenal

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Van Persie and 4 4 2 return for Chelsea. Cesc may be back too

By 1970’s Gooner

Could Manchester United have managed without Rooney, Ronaldo and Vidic, three of their most influential players, for say three consecutive away games? They may get away with it for a game or so but not three on the trot. In fact Manchester United’s recent defeat at Bolton was with a team that was deprived exactly those three players.

Could Chelsea be as efficient if Terry, Lampard and Drogba were missing from a particular game? In fact most of the points they dropped at the start of the season were due to the absence of these players.

Arsenal in comparison have done well considering that not three but four of their most important players this season have been missing for the last four games and nearly all three away successive games: Fabregas, Flamini, Hleb and Robin Van Persie.

This is irrespective of Arsene Wenger’s selection policy in replacing the injured midfielders.

So after the draw at Newcastle and the depressing defeat at Middlesbrough it is with some relief that Robin Van Persie has been training freely at London Colney and has started and performed so well against Steaua.

He has been out since damaging his knee playing for Holland against Slovenia as far back as two months ago from the middle of October. Adebayor has been leading the line mostly on his own and it has become obvious that he needs a second forward with him for support.

Arsene Wenger was probably averse to giving support to Adebayor when RVP was absent as he was probably unsure whether Eduardo or Bendtner were ready to play that role.

In fact he preferred Hleb instead in a 4 4 1 1 formation. This in practice turned into a 4 5 1 as Hleb had the tendency to veer towards the middle of the pitch and try and organize play rather than stay nearer Adebayor as a second forward.

When Hleb became unavailable Eduardo was given his chance at Newcastle and Middlesbrough but failed to impress.

Van Persie’s return to fitness means that Arsene Wenger can now revert to his preferred 4 4 2 again with a player who is used to performing under that system.

Van Persie himself said: "I am fit if the boss picks me. I am available. However, I am not 100% yet. "I can easily make 60-65 minutes”.

Even if it is only for an hour Van Persie should start on Sunday.

And there may be some more good news for Arsenal. It appears that Fabregas has been pushing for a return to action, no doubt against Chelsea on Sunday.

Arsene Wenger has said that "Cesc is very impatient, but he is not back yet. We haven't set any date for his return yet. He is with the medical people being treated and he is working very hard”.

Cesc has been out of action since limping out of the Champions League clash in Sevilla on November 27 due to a hamstring problem.

Straining of the hamstring, also known as a pulled hamstring, is defined as an excessive stretch or tear of muscle fibers and related tissues.

My medical friends inform me that hamstring strains are usually classified under three grades: I, II and III. Grade I is the mildest strain and a slight feeling of pain when the muscles are stretched or contracted.

With a Grade II strain there is immediate pain which is more severe than the pain of a grade one injury. Grade III is what is known as a torn muscle which may require surgery.

As a general rule, Grade I hamstring strains should be rested from sporting activity for about 3 weeks and grade two injuries for about 4 to 6 weeks. In the case of a complete rupture, the muscle will have to be repaired surgically and the rehabilitation afterwards will take about 3 months.

By next Sunday Fabregas would have been out of action for 20 days; that is nearly three weeks ago. If his injury was a grade I type then he must be very close to a come back.

Now whether Wenger will risk playing him with the chance of the injury recurring is another matter. He will have to rely on the medical team’s advice who have done a magnificent job in getting Van Persie back into action.

“Van Persie is ready physically,” said Wenger. “But we have some other players who are injured like Fabregas, like Hleb and Flamini. “Though I will certainly have to take a gamble on one or two”.

Flamini has been reported to be very near fitness and should be back for Sunday. So if Wenger takes a gamble he may have to decide between Cesc and Hleb.

A difficult choice but since it was in central midfield that problems were more apparent recently he may, all things being equal, lean towards Fabregas.


Anonymous said...

Right so Cesc hasn't been training with the first team and is merely working with Medical staff -

Yet from there you jump to the conclusion that he might play against Chelsea.

You dope - what the hell is you talking about?

Stop writing and get a job please.

Anonymous said...

Personally I would risk Hleb. I am not saying one is a better player than the other and though clearly Fabregas has gained most of the plaudits this year, I would not understate the importance hleb has to this team. his ability to beat a man and therefore create that little bit of space which is so vital against a team like CHelsea could be the difference. Cesc is also younger and risking injuries at his age is something that can have a longer lasting effect. Risk Hleb and allow Cesc to be back for the Tottenham game

Anonymous said...

Wenger has said himself that he may take a "risk" in choosing from Cesc, Flamini and Hleb. So it shows to me that Cesc is near a return and so is Hleb. I would choose Cesc. We need to add his creativity in midfield.

Anonymous said...

I would choose Cesc anytime.


Sagna Toure Gallas Clichy

Rosicky Fab Flamini Eboue

RVP Bendtner

Anonymous said...

I would risk all three.

Anonymous said...

That would be dangerous goofle. Three points are three points whoever you play. we cant risk having all them getting injured again i think.

Anonymous said...

off topic, but that's a huge calf muscle.

Anonymous said...

why would you start bendtner instead of adebayor??? why is he always being criticized when he is consistently scoring goals and even leading the Premiership with 9... yea he might dissappear in some games and lose his touch here and there but he never stops working, running and has a great goal scoring record this year....

Anonymous said...

I'd love to know what Adebayors goal:shot ratio is and compare it with the other top 5 prem strikers. I just get the sense that Ade needs twice as many opportunities to score than most decent strikers despite being top scorer at the moment.

Anonymous said...

ugg boots ugg bootsuggs uggsugg sale ugg saleaustralia ugg bootswomens uggs boots womens uggs bootsmens uggs boots mens uggs bootskids uggs boots kids uggs bootsUGG Boots Accessories UGG Boots Accessoriesbailey button ugg boots bailey button ugg bootsnightfall ugg boots nightfall ugg bootssundance ii ugg boots sundance ii ugg bootsultra tall ugg boots ultra tall ugg bootsultra short ugg boots ultra short ugg bootsclassic tall ugg boots classic tall ugg bootsclassic short ugg boots classic short ugg bootsclassic cardy ugg boots classic cardy ugg bootsclassic mini ugg boots classic mini ugg bootsmetallic ugg boots metallic ugg boots As Seen On TV As Seen On TV As Seen On TV Discounts As Seen On TV Discounts As Seen On TV Promotions As Seen On TV Promotions As Seen On TV Store As Seen On TV Store As Seen On TV Products As Seen On TV Products As Seen On TV Infomercials As Seen On TV Infomercials TV Household TV Household TV Health TV Health TV Auto TV Auto TV Pets TV Pets TV Video TV Video TV Gifts TV Gifts TV Electronics TV Electronics TV Kids TV Kids

Anonymous said...

To be a good lenient being is to procure a amiable of openness to the world, an skill to trusteeship uncertain things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in very exceptional circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably outstanding thither the fettle of the honest autobiography: that it is based on a conviction in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a jewel, something fairly tenuous, but whose very special attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.